Why do we need a facilities plan now?
Our buildings are aging, and many systems are past their useful lifespan. Safety expectations have changed, and many spaces no longer support the way students learn today. Delaying action increases long-term costs and puts more pressure on aging facilities.
What does it mean for question 1 to be mill rate neutral? What is the tax impact of this plan?
If question 1 passes, it will not increase the mill (tax) rate levied by the district. The district is paying off an existing bond about 6 years early, so question 1, if successful, would continue the existing mill rate to roll into a new bond and fund these projects. The district is also adjusting the mill rate for its local option budget (LOB) to match the current need, which gives some additional room to cover the cost of this bond without increasing the mill rate.
Because question 1 must be successful for question 2 to move forward, question 2 then requires a mill rate increase of 4.75. This equates to $9.10/month ($109.20/year for the median homeowner in McPherson ($200,000) home.
How is this plan different from past proposals that failed?
In several important ways:
- It serves all students, not just a few buildings.
- It reduces the number of buildings in the long term.
- It invests in what we already own, rather than building more than we need.
- It keeps middle school and high school separate.
- It addresses flooding at both secondary campuses.
- It provides secure entrances at all schools.
- It is more affordable and more aligned with community priorities.
This plan directly reflects what our community said the last plan did not address.
Why is it 2 questions?
Presenting the bond in two questions allows voters to clearly see how needs are prioritized and how later improvements depend on the success of the first phase. While both questions reflect essential long-term needs, Question 1 is intentionally positioned as the starting point, with Question 2 contingent upon its passage.
Why is question 2 contingent on question 1?
Question 1 addresses the district’s most urgent facility needs and establishes the foundational work and financial structure for the bond. It reflects the Board’s highest priorities and continues the district’s existing mill rate into a new bond, creating a responsible and stable funding base. For transparency, the district is clearly showing the community that these top-priority needs can be addressed with no mill levy increase.
Question 2 builds on that foundation. It focuses on resolving the district’s middle school challenges, which represent a secondary but still critical need. It is designed to move forward only if the work and financial framework established through Question 1 is in place.
Presenting the bond in two questions allows voters to clearly see how needs are prioritized and how later improvements depend on the success of the first phase. While both questions reflect essential long-term needs, Question 1 is intentionally positioned as the starting point, with Question 2 contingent upon its passage.
Will this plan reduce long-term costs?
Yes. Consolidation and modernization reduce:
- Utility costs
- Staffing overhead
- Maintenance expenses
- Major system failures
- Long-term capital needs
This plan is both educationally strong and fiscally responsible.
How are potential budget overages handled if the bond passes?
Strong cost controls, phased design, and regular cost checks with independent estimators are used throughout the process to keep projects on budget.
The bond program is developed using conservative cost estimates and includes built-in contingencies to account for unknown conditions that are common in renovation projects. A standard construction contingency—typically in the range of 5–8% depending on project type and risk—is included in the overall budget, along with separate allowances for escalation and unforeseen conditions.
If unexpected issues arise, the district’s first approach is to adjust scope within the approved budget, prioritizing safety, code compliance, and educational impact. Any significant changes beyond the approved budget would require Board action, and the district cannot exceed the voter-approved bond amount.